Comparison
Nov 26, 2025
B2B Enrichment vs Bright Data

Dawn Odom
Many major industry participants who rely on business data at scale understand that well-quality, compliant data are the pillars of modern sales and marketing.
But then there's a huge difference between data collection and effective data.
Two of the top companies frequently cited in the B2B data market are B2B Enrichment and Bright Data.
While both process data, their core value propositions are vastly different.
Bright Data provides the underlying infrastructure (proxies, scrapers, APIs) that enables you to build your own datasets from the public web.
B2B Enrichment, in contrast, offers pre-use, validated, and structured B2B company and contact information in real-time.
So if your business needs clean, accurate, and enriched B2B profiles, then B2B Enrichment is made for that.
And if your business needs to scrape and collect raw public web data on a range of domains, Bright Data provides the infrastructure to do it.
As both businesses operate within the data collection ecosystem, both vendors:
Are GDPR- and privacy-framework compliant.
Do not require you to handle complex scraping or proxy management (for B2B Enrichment).
Return data consumable legally in business intelligence, sales, and marketing operations.
Yet the core differences between the two platforms make them suitable for extremely disparate users.
Core Product Differences
Bright Data is a web data platform based on a data collection infrastructure.
B2B Enrichment is a B2B data supplier that provides ready-to-use structured business data.
Bright Data resells data gathering instruments, proxies, APIs, scrapers, and datasets.
B2B Enrichment re-sells data itself, pre-assembled, validated, and enhanced company and contact records.
B2B Enrichment | Bright Data | |
|---|---|---|
Core Offering | Ready-to-use, structured B2B contact and company data. | Infrastructure for extracting public web data (proxies, scrapers, datasets). |
Data Type | B2B professional and company information (emails, roles, industries, LinkedIn URLs). | General public web data (eCommerce, social, SERP, finance, etc.). |
Primary Focus | Enrichment and data accuracy for B2B teams. | Large-scale data collection and scraping. |
And that is the fundamental difference: Bright Data sells the tools; B2B Enrichment sells the result.
Pricing
B2B Enrichment relies on a simple credit-based model designed for scale and predictability.
Credits can be used for profile enrichment, search, and email verification.
Bright Data, however, uses multiple usage-based models, depending on which product you use, proxies, APIs, or datasets.
B2B Enrichment | Bright Data | |
|---|---|---|
Model | Credit-based | Usage-based (GB, requests, datasets) |
Starting Plan | $30 for 10,000 credits (~$0.003/credit) | $2.50/GB (Residential Proxies), $1/1K requests (APIs), $250/month (Datasets) |
High-Tier Pricing | Down to $0.001/credit (Ultimate Plan) | Increases with data volume and complexity |
Transparency | Clear, fixed tiers | Complex, product-dependent |
Verdict:
B2B Enrichment offers clear, predictable pricing that scales with you, without data pipeline or bandwidth fees to worry about.
Data Completeness
While both platforms deal with data, the quantity and quality of their data are entirely different.
B2B Enrichment is specialty in trustworthy B2B contact and company data.
Every profile has verified business emails, company metadata, and enriched information such as industry, size, and location.
Bright Data, however, provides the scraping tools, so data format and quality depend on the user's individual setup.
B2B Enrichment | Bright Data | |
|---|---|---|
Data Focus | B2B professionals and companies. | General web data. |
Accuracy | Verified work emails and structured records. | Depends on the scraping setup. |
Data Points | Name, title, company, industry, size, revenue, email, LinkedIn URL, location. | Raw data from chosen sources. |
Verification | Built-in Email API + Catch-all domain handling. | Not provided, must use external verification tools. |
Summary:
Both services can give you useful information, but B2B Enrichment has it ready to go, while Bright Data leaves it up to you to fetch and clean it.
Ease Of Use
Both B2B Enrichment and Bright Data are geared towards technically experienced customers, but their ease of integration and usability scenarios are very different.
B2B Enrichment offers plug-and-play.
You give an input (company name, domain, or company), and you get enriched, structured data in real time via API.
No crawling, proxy rotation, or parsing required.
Bright Data offers robust but intricate infrastructure APIs (Unlocker, SERP, Crawl, Browser), which need to be set up, maintained, and monitored.
B2B Enrichment | Bright Data | |
|---|---|---|
Ease of Integration | Simple REST APIs for enrichment and search. | Multiple complex APIs for crawling, SERP, and browser automation. |
Interface | Lightweight dashboard + API access. | Web interface for managing crawlers and proxies. |
Ideal Users | Sales, marketing, and recruitment teams. | Data engineers and scraping specialists. |
Verdict:
If you want to use data, use B2B Enrichment.
If you're in need of harvesting data, utilize Bright Data.
API Availability and Reliability
Both websites expose APIs, but the experience and consistency of performance differ.
B2B Enrichment APIs are built for real-time scaling enrichment, providing clean B2B data with validated contact info.
Bright Data's APIs are used for bulk web crawling and extraction, but performance is at the mercy of external factors like site structure and proxy conditions.
B2B Enrichment | Bright Data | |
|---|---|---|
API Focus | Real-time B2B data enrichment and search. | Web scraping, SERP access, proxy management. |
Success Rate | 99%+ (structured dataset response). | ~80% success rate (dependent on scraping environment). |
Rate Limit | High-throughput API with stable performance. | No rate limit, but success depends on proxy quality. |
Summary:
They both provide APIs, but B2B Enrichment's APIs provide ready data, while Bright Data's APIs give you raw HTML that you'll need to process.
Summary: B2B Enrichment vs Bright Data
B2B Enrichment vs Bright Data’s Web Data Platform
Use B2B Enrichment if your primary use case is B2B data enrichment, lead generation, and sales intelligence, as it's cheaper, faster, and offers more extensive, verified business data without scraping hassles.
Use Bright Data if you are already in their ecosystem and need generic web data for training AI models, market research, or SEO.
B2B Enrichment | Bright Data | |
|---|---|---|
Ideal For | Sales, marketing, and recruitment teams. | Data engineers, researchers, and analysts. |
Data Type | Ready-to-use B2B contact data. | General raw web data. |
Pricing | Predictable, low-cost, per-credit model. | Variable, per GB/request. |
Setup | Instant API access. | Requires configuration and maintenance. |
Accuracy | Verified, structured B2B profiles. | Depends on scraping results. |
Final Recommendation
Use Bright Data if you need raw, bulk web data across many different verticals and have the engineering resources to deal with scraping pipelines.
Use B2B Enrichment if your business needs instant, verified B2B data for prospecting, lead enrichment, and CRM enrichment.
It's faster, more accurate, and less expensive, with no scraping or proxies necessary.


